Why United States Flag Burning is Wrong Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

Why United States Flag Burning is Wrong - Essay ExampleThey often implement yield burning as a manner of protest in order to demonstrate the intensity of distaste that the harbor for various issues in America. Nevertheless, the stick is a part of America and an attack on it should be viewed as an attack on the country. While there have been various decisions by the US court system that both criminalize and allow for this shameful activity, the fact of the matter is that flag burning should be against the law.There was a case on flag burning in Texas that reached the Supreme Court. In Texas v. Johnson (1989), Johnson had been convicted for his crimes by the Texas court system. The flag has been burned as a way of protest during a prove that had been held to express dissatisfaction with some of President Regans policies for corporations (Texas v. Johnson, 1989). In Texas, at that time, burning the American Flag was against the law. Nevertheless, the Supreme Court raise that any la w which dependant flag burring violated the First Amendment (Texas v. Johnson, 1989). Flag burning has been against the law at the federal level due to the Flag Protection Act of 1968, and many body politic and local governments held such laws as well. However, as a result of this case, the federal, state, and local governments could no longer uphold these laws. Then, in 1990, there was another case that dealt with flag burning. With the case of U.S. v. Eichman (1990) the flag burning parties had to be released.Time and time again, cases have been presented to the Supreme Court that sought to address the issue of flag burning. Yet, those who have been found guilty of flag burning have gotten away with it. This is not because the Supreme Court believes that it is okay to burn the flag, but because they have found it difficult to posit flag burning against the law without violating the First Amendment, which states, Congress shall make no lawabridging the freedom of