Religion Essay -- essays research papers

The debate over the economic advantages of thralldom in the South has raged ever since the first of all slaves began working in the cotton fields of the Southern States. Initially, the wealth of the New World was in the form of raw materials and agricultural goods such as cotton, sugar, and tobacco. Slavery, without a doubt, had its pelfable aspects prior to the Civil War. However, this postulation began to change as abolitionists claimed the land of the Southern Plantations was overworked and the potential income of slaves was lower than that of albumen people who had a vested interest in the productivity and success of the South.The concept of slavery had been brought over to America by the ideals of British Mercantilism which called for strict regulation of the state and its people for the good of the subject economy. In the early 1700s, Frenchman Colbert stated that, "no commerce in the world produces as many advantages as that of the slave trade"(Williams, 144). Th e inhumane practice of slavery began in the American colonies in 1619. Although Africans first came to the New World around 1501, the early colonists did not think to use them as slave labor. Instead, they imported poor, white indentured servants from Europe to clear forests and cultivate fields. It was the English colonists that incited the idea of using Black slaves. They could be caught easily because of their color and they could be bought and kept until they died. "Negroes, from a gentile land and without exposure to the ethical ideals of Christianity, could be handled with more rigid methods of discipline and could be morally and spiritually degraded for the sake of stability on the plantation, wrote historians privy Hope Franklin and Alfred A. Moss Jr. in "From Slavery to Freedom" (22). Where America failed in Mercantilism was in not providing enough slaves to generate a sufficient profit margin and by becoming a divided nation over the issue of slavery.Southern slaves were viewed in economic terms of labor to capital. While the will power of slaves was a source of pride in plantation owners, this interdependence of slave on master and master to slave created a vicious cycle of vacuity that caused slave owners to often become irrational. In the south, slaveholdings varied according to size, location, and currys produced. Slavery in cities differed substantially from th... ...er to the problem of slavery. Olmsted asserted that the majority of those who sell the cotton crop were poorer than the majority of our day-labourers at the North (171). His chief complaint with slavery was that the quantity produced by slaves, be it cotton or tobacco or any merchantable good, was drastically inferior. Olmsted asserted that it took two times as many slaves as Northern labourers to accomplish a task (172). Low-quality labor, poor use of resources, and indifferent oversight all combined, said Olmsted, to make southern agriculture far less efficient than northern agriculture (172). Olmsted asserted that psychologically, slaves preformed poorly under conditions of fear of punishment and free men, without this fear, would certainly be more productive in defending their reputation and standing with pride with their employer.The low productivity of slaves could be explained by the conditions in which they were forced to live and work in. Inadequate care, incentives and training left the slaves without proper preparation for their role on the plantation (Genovese, 46). A cyclical effect of malnutrition and complaint was apparent on many plantations. Since malnutrition