Research paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words - 9

Research Paper ExampleFoner reveals that prior to the trial, the defendants enjoyed access to lawyers. Consequently, the defendants had insignificant clock clipping for planning defense. 2 He has added that, the defendants appealed against the above ruling on the basis of inadequate legal counsel. Notably, the coercive court of Alabama ruled by a vote of six against one that on that point was a fair trial. Considerably, it is noneworthy pointing out that Anderson, the chief justice, produced a tough nonconformist opinion that resulted to an appeal to the sovereign Court in the US against the ruling. The Courts Ruling Hoffmann et al indicates that, during the ruling, the supreme USs Supreme Court majority opinion overturned and remanded the ruling of the supreme court of Alabama, maintaining that the court had violate the due process. Notably, the Supreme Courts decision rested on three significant arguments firstly, the defendants did not receive fair, unbiased and purposeful t rial. Secondly, they did not access the discipline of counsel, with the familiar audience incidents and a notice for trial. Lastly, the trial took place before juries chosen racially from un dependent people hence systematically excluding qualified juries. It is worthwhile noting that the conviction was unlawful since the accused did not access the counsels assistance right from their arraignment up to the commencement of their trial. This led to breaching the due process section of the 14th Amendment. Foner indicates that the section, counsel has to be accepted to anybody subject to the likelihood of a death sentence, be it in state or else federal courts.3 Conclusively, our classify does not support the courts ruling because as indicated above, had interfered with state courts hence, going beyond its jurisdiction. Consequently, our radical has agreed with the above discussed dissenting opinions because the trial court had really acted upon the laid down procedures. The only l acking(p) point is the lack of representation for the defendants. However, one should note that a court has its own individual reasons to at times deviate from norms especially if the situation calls for the same. Notably, the US Supreme Court did not conduct situational summary before delivering its ruling. 4 Consequences/implications of the Ruling Assuming the court it is absolutely devoid of merit, all other claims that the petitioners native rights got violated, positions its viewpoint and ruling upon a solitary declaration of reality. Furthermore, the petitioners did not access the right of counsel, with the familiar consultation incidents and preparation opportunity for trial. If this is factual, they were deprived of the due process of law hence, they were at liberty to have the rulings against them upturned, however, there are no records for such denial. Hoffmann et al argues that nine defendants, together with Patterson, were charged for one condemnation, and he was as we ll unconnectedly indicted. As opposed to trying using the en masse, the government provided four trials hence decrease the risk of error and unfairness that unavoidably attends an effort in a particular trial to delay the culpability or blamelessness of the accused.5 Dissenting opinions If right, the judgment that the malfunction of the trial court to grant petitioners time as